Denver Broncos blog, news and rumors


FB

[hype it up!]
[Share with Yardbarker]

Published on 12/21/2009 at Mon Dec 21 21:54.
Tagged: ,,,,,,.



Head coach Josh McDaniels addressed the media a day after the Broncos‘ 19-20 to Oakland.

HEAD COACH JOSH McDANIELS

Denver Broncos head coach Josh McDaniels yells at the referees from the sidelines during their NFL football game against the Oakland Raiders in Denver December 20, 2009. (REUTERS/Rick Wilking)

Denver Broncos head coach Josh McDaniels yells at the referees from the sidelines during their NFL football game against the Oakland Raiders in Denver December 20, 2009. (REUTERS/Rick Wilking)

Opening comments

“As I said yesterday after the game, we just missed so many opportunities in critical situations, and at this time of the year against a division opponent, those ultimately always come back to haunt you. Yesterday, that’s really what the case was. We couldn’t score on the goal line for a number of reasons. We couldn’t keep the ball away from (Oakland) when we got the ball back with four minutes to go in the game. We couldn’t stop them. In the two-minute defense, they had a couple penalties that kept the drive alive. We ultimately couldn’t stop them there on the fourth down or the touchdown play. (We had) trouble in the red zone again—three negative plays, a sack, a penalty. Then in the run defense, (Oakland had) seven runs for 161 yards, a 23-yard average, and then the rest of the game, (we allowed a) 2.6-yard average on 26 carries. It wasn’t all bad, but certainly on those plays, it was close to terrible. Again, if you don’t make the plays in those critical situations this time of year, you’re going to be in close games, and ultimately, those are the plays that determine the outcome most of the time.”

On his emphasis on situational football in practice

“It’s definitely something that we emphasized, definitely something that we’ve done a lot of. I think our team understands the importance of it. It’s not that they aren’t playing hard. It’s not that they’re not giving great effort. It’s not that they’re not trying to do everything that we’re asking them to do. They’re not entirely to blame for any of this, either. This is a game where you’ve got to coach well in those situations, you’ve got to play well in those situations and it’s got to kind of marry together. It’s frustrating, but I think that tells you how important it is. Again, we’re not dead. We’re going to keep playing, and we’ve got to get better at some of these things, certainly. As long as we have the opportunity to practice and keep playing, then our focus will be on trying to improve in all these areas so that if we get into those situations again this weekend that we can convert or hold them or stop them or not commit a penalty, whatever it may be, to lose those critical situations because sometimes you can play the rest of the game evenly or even win the rest of the game in some situations, but if you lose a few of these critical plays, that determines the game.”

On getting a goal-line stop against Oakland in the second half after allowing three runs for 86 yards on the same drive

“That was kind of symbolic of the game. Like I said, seven carries accounted for 160 yards and the rest of the game we gave up 2.5 yards a carry. You can break down statistics however much you want to. The bottom line is we gave up way too many big runs, obviously. To keep the field position that we wanted to at times—I think the drive you’re referring to started at the (Oakland) 11—to let them out and to let them out that quickly, to let them go right down the field and end up at the 3-yard line in three plays, it’s going to be hard to beat anybody.”

On the philosophy that rookies begin to show more fatigue at this point in the season

“I understand that this is a different experience for all of the rookies. I also think that we have other players that play every position that those rookies play. Those are the guys that take a lot of snaps for them. I’m not saying it’s not a challenge for them mentally or physically to focus and to be able to maintain a certain level of play, but there are a lot of other things that go into winning and losing, good plays and bad plays. It’s not just a one-player type of thing. We all have got to do better.”

On if RB Knowshon Moreno has shown signs of fatigue late in the season

“Again, I go back to say the run game is not about one player. There are a lot of things that have to go right in the running game. If they go right, everybody’s happy and we make a lot of yards. If they don’t, then we don’t. It’s got to be a lot of things that go hand-in-hand and work well together, and if they do, then we’ll be successful at that. If we don’t, then we’ll have trouble.”

On what allowed Oakland to record multiple long runs

“We did some things well most of the day in the run defense. On some of those big ones, a lot of them were (on) the back side against a zone-run team. It’s really critical that you play the front side well, also, so that you don’t just let the ball keep going outside to the sideline. At the same time, when you force the ball inside, you’ve got to squeeze hard from the back side so that there’s not a big comeback lane. They had a few of those that were cutback runs. Any time you’re playing the zone-run scheme, the ball could hit anywhere from the sideline on the front side to all the way on the back side. I think (RB Darren) McFadden’s run there that took it to the 3-yard line started right and went all the way back to the left. We’ve all got to play that play well. The front side has to play it well, the inside has got to play it well and the back side has got to play it well. That’s the challenge when you play against a zone-run team. It’s not okay to do it right 26 times and not do it right those seven other plays because they can kill you.”

On the Broncos’ passing game against Oakland

“They do some things (and) play a lot of man coverage. Guys fought to try to get off some of the press and the jams. (There was) a lot of scrapping going on. We definitely got more production out of it in the second half and got some things going. (WR) Brandon (Marshall) made some plays there and (WR Brandon) Stokley obviously made a critical play late in the game. You know it’s not easy to throw the ball on that team. Everybody would agree with that in the league. You’ve got really good corners and cover players, fast players, covering you and you’ve got to try to create some separation. We missed some opportunities, but I thought we took advantage of some things in the second half and created some openings for ourselves and got some things going. Throwing the ball, ultimately, to try to beat that team is not necessarily the best formula, which is why we tried to stay committed to the running game. It just never really produced enough for us.”

On evaluating his decisions the day after a game

“I think you always look at it and say, ‘What could I have done different? Is there a different call that I could’ve made?’ I think as a coordinator or a head coach, play caller, game planner, you always want to call the perfect play. You want to put your guys in the perfect situation every time. That’s your hope and desire every time that you put something on the board or put something in the game plan or call something into the huddle. If you feel like you could have done something different, then the next day is always that day where you look at it and say, ‘If we had only called this, maybe that would have worked.’ That’s why I said that it’s so important for the plan and the execution of the plan to be married together. When you’ve got a good plan and you’ve got good execution, you usually have a good result. If you have hits and misses during the course of the game in either phase, whether it be the call or the execution, you have trouble.”

On times when a different play call could have worked better against Oakland

“I’m not going to go into a play-by-play thing. I think we had plenty of opportunities as I just mentioned. We had plenty of opportunities to win the game. They played better than we did in those situations—that’s just the bottom line—and coached better. We’ve got to do better than that.”

On the keys to a successful running play

“When you run any play, I don’t care what play you’re running, you’ve got to identify the (defensive) front, identify who’s blocking who, block the play properly and then long enough to sustain it so that the back can get through there. The back has to read the play properly and take the ball where it’s designed to go based on whatever the defense is doing, and then the quarterback can also get us in or out of—there are a handful of plays that we go either way. There are a lot of things that have to go into that. The issue with the running game—and that’s why it’s so beautiful when it works and so painful when it doesn’t—is if one of those things isn’t right, you can end up with a lot of runs and not a lot yards. At the same time, if everybody’s working well together and you’re running the right stuff and reading it the right way and blocking them long enough and identifying the front properly, you can run a lot of runs for a lot of yards. You look at film every week as a coach and you say we were that block or that read or that adjustment away from that 2-yard run being 25, but that also includes good defense, too. There are a lot of things that have to go right in this league, obviously, to have success on either side of the ball or in the kicking game. The running game is just one example of that.”

On if the fact that Philadelphia is favored on Sunday benefits the Broncos

“I don’t know about that. I think we’re a resilient group. I think I’ve said it 100 times: we’ve got great leadership, which I still believe in. Like I said, we’re far from being dead now. We’ve got a lot to play for. We still have put ourselves in position to qualify (for the playoffs) and do the things we want to do. I don’t think that that attitude or mindset is going to help us win the game. ‘This is a team that nobody thinks we’re going to beat, so we’re probably going to beat them.’ It doesn’t work that way. This is a very harsh league that if you don’t play well enough against anybody, you’re going to be a in a dogfight or you’re going to find yourself on the losing end. We need to have a great week of preparation. This is one of the best teams in all of football, a great organization, and they’re playing extremely well. They’re playing for a lot, too. We expect it to be a really difficult preparation, a difficult game. Those are the kind of games you’ve got to win. If you think you’re going to do much in January, you’ve got to be able to play good teams on the road and play your best football and ultimately make the plays you need to make to win.”

On if he is hopeful RB Correll Buckhalter and S Renaldo Hill will be active this week

“Yes, I am hopeful on both.”

On the offense’s progress this season

“Certainly, you can’t say that we made progress yesterday, but I think that this game is funny that way in that you might be a week away from progress. You’ve got to do a lot of little things right, a lot of little things better. Like I said, you’ve got to have a good plan, and if you can execute it, then you see progress quickly. That’s the good thing about this is you can have a really solid performance and say we’re making progress, and it only takes one poor performance for you to say the exact opposite. Everything we did yesterday wasn’t bad, certainly, in any phase, but really, it’s the critical plays where we need to make the most progress. Those are the things that determine the outcome at this time of the year and (are) largely responsible for why we weren’t more successful yesterday.”

  • NMBronc

    1. O-line needs upgrade (hochstein) and to be healthy (harris).
    2. Qb needs upgrade!
    3. D-Line needs an upgrade!
    3. Coach McMFD you need better synapse firing during play calling.
    4. Hillis???

    And most importantly, drop the ego. You are a good coach, but you have not produced at your mentor's level.

    Oh yeah and sign Marshall and Doom!

  • TheTroglodyte

    Considering NE's huge drop in offensive production without McD and the fact that with a tougher schedule we are 1 game short of the same record the Pats have and we beat the Pats… I wouldn't say he hasn't produced at his mentor's level. I would say he is an outstanding rookie coach with room for growth and who takes responsibility after every loss. People with Ego problems don't usually do that. I'm not sure where the “Mcd has an ego” started but it's a little absurd and not founded on anything.

  • Adrenaline27

    AGREED… We have out shined in my opinion this season from what I ever thought we would do. Not bad being a rookie coach with all the off season stuff that went on. New QB. Pretty much new defense. New coaches in some spots. Like I said before them going 6-0 I think gave everyone false positive. I for one am excited about the future and I think McD is a breath of fresh air. Don't get me wrong I like Shanny but I do think it was time for a change.

    Number one off season move. Sign Marshall. The team will struggle with out him period. He as proven himself and so far has done everything they have asked of him. I like his drive that he brings to every game.

    I will say this again, Orton isnt a bad QB. I don't know why everyone wants to throw him under the bus. He is doing what they want. Hell no QB in the NFL is going to be that good if you don't give him protection and a running game, at least not week end and week out.

  • candide

    Gaffney and Royal have combined for zero TDs. That's hard to believe after 14 games. McD promised we 'd see things on offense never seen before in the NFL. Maybe it was that failed lateral to Clady. That worked out great. 14 weeks in and Don'tknowshon is still stutter stepping at the line of scrimmage before being slap tackled to the ground.

  • Michael T

    Is anybody else here sick of the negative SOBs trashing not only the team, but the fans in the comment section of the DP? I'm talking personal attacks. f****n' imbeciles.

  • BeD

    Before the season started most were predicting the Broncos would only win 3 or 4 games. Now they have a good chance…albeit slim…to go to the playoffs…as one person early on stated, “I am a fan of the team but not of some 'fans.'”

  • kerry

    Orotn isnt a good QB. he never has been and never will be. there are QB's who can actually make plays and improvise if the O-line and running game arent playing up to par. Orton isnt one of those QB's. i sure dont want cutler back, but with him we at least had a chance to extend the play or scramble for those yards that we needed. Orton just stands there and if his first read isnt open he throws it away or eats the ball. this guy doesnt even attempt to go in another direction. thats why Royal and Stokley and Scheffler never get involved because Orton never can make a second read. blame the O-line and running game all you want, but Orton isnt anything special and certainly isnt a playmaker at the QB position. hell even Jake Plummer could extend a play or scramble.

  • Jestep

    Broncos have some very talented players, but when the play-calling prevents them from doing anything or attempting a field goal more than 50 yards, they going to lose every time.

    Almost every set was, run up the middle, pass backwards to the left, run up the middle again, repeat…

    When Orton was allowed to throw down-field, we got first downs and generally ripped apart the defense. This game was like watching internal sabotage. 3-2 on their own 20, QB sneak, good idea….

    A 5 year old with a NFL madden game could call better plays than this… Ugh, just painful to watch.

  • anthony33

    Agree with kerry here… Orton, while not a slug by any means, is not the long term answer or even the mid-term answer. We need to get a QB in the draft, preferably Locker (one of the few that remind me of you know who).
    To get Locker you are obviously going to have to move up from the probable 8-10 spot to one of the first 3. Trade the 8-10 and Marshall to get there.

    Maybe Brandstater is the answer, but who the hell knows. If he still inactive after the fiasco called Simms played, then I would guess he is not the answer.

  • mangeletti

    I actually think Orton is playing fine. Probably half the quarterbacks in the league are worse than him and the other half are better.

    What I see is the receivers need to run routes that have a higher percentage of being completed. In other words, don't make that such a difficult ball to catch. Case in point, that missed TD pass to Scheffler where he has to catch it over the DB and over his shoulder, he missed it. Why not throw that pass to the near pylon? You know that pass that you ran on the playground all the time as a kid, run 6 yards, chuck the guy then turn to the pylon for a high percentage catch. Why don't we do that?

  • Rich

    How about not using Hillis on short yardage! Thats an ego problem. Since when is a 6th round pich held to a higher standard

  • kerry

    cant get Jake Locker. he is going back to Washington for another year. so we would have to draft Jimmy Clausen or Colt McCoy. McCoy actaully would be decent considering he has a good arm and mobility. maybe Tony Pike also. just not Orton next year. if anything give Brandstater a chance. he cant be worse then Orton but maybe better.

  • TheTroglodyte

    I don't like not using Hillis as much as anyone but you have no idea any more than anyone else why he is not being used. To label it an “ego” problem proves exactly that. It's an absurd and arbitrary statement people throw around when they don't like something about McD.

  • GrinandTell

    I don't have to hear McD say, “Its not my fault” to sense that he's still being defensive and willfully deflecting blame (while sounding, or rather, play-calling as egotistically as ever).

    McD knows how to talk, but hearing him excuse not passing the ball INTO the end-zone more against the Raiders is a tip-off (if you know how to read between the lines).

    Yes, the Raiders are quick and have a lot of talent in their back seven. But we have guys like B-Marsh and Graham that can run five-yard patterns and box-out the defenders by turning their backs and either heading to the end-zone corner or starting that way and crossing over the middle.

    Both are good at catching tight passes in traffic, yet we rarely if ever see McD allowing Orton the green-light to make those throws in our now-inevitable end-zone stalls.

    So, to toady up to the coach by stating there's no evidence of his ego is plain nonsense. Unless your standard is seeing his nose grow or his head inflate to three-times its normal circumference in the post-game presser, all you need do is ask what's missing from his play-calls (and observe how the same conservatism that helped us when the offenses were getting acclimated to the faster-starting defenses is still shackling the passing that we need to keep red-zone defenses honest).

  • TheTroglodyte

    I don't like not using Hillis as much as anyone but you have no idea any more than anyone else why he is not being used. To label it an “ego” problem proves exactly that. It's an absurd and arbitrary statement people throw around when they don't like something about McD.

  • GrinandTell

    I don't have to hear McD say, “Its not my fault” to sense that he's still being defensive and willfully deflecting blame (while sounding, or rather, play-calling as egotistically as ever).

    McD knows how to talk, but hearing him excuse not passing the ball INTO the end-zone more against the Raiders is a tip-off (if you know how to read between the lines).

    Yes, the Raiders are quick and have a lot of talent in their back seven. But we have guys like B-Marsh and Graham that can run five-yard patterns and box-out the defenders by turning their backs and either heading to the end-zone corner or starting that way and crossing over the middle.

    Both are good at catching tight passes in traffic, yet we rarely if ever see McD allowing Orton the green-light to make those throws in our now-inevitable end-zone stalls.

    So, to toady up to the coach by stating there's no evidence of his ego is plain nonsense. Unless your standard is seeing his nose grow or his head inflate to three-times its normal circumference in the post-game presser, all you need do is ask what's missing from his play-calls (and observe how the same conservatism that helped us when the offenses were getting acclimated to the faster-starting defenses is still shackling the passing that we need to keep red-zone defenses honest).