Broncos waive Kyle Orton

He can take hits but for how long? Hopefully he can complete a pass before he does get hurt.

The point is, it’s a gimmick offense, they arent sustainable, especially when there’s no threat of the pass. The ball Decker threw last week was better than 70% of Tebows passes.

The word you’re grasping for is milquetoast, Idiot.  

What!?  That’s right, what.

What has K.O. done for the Denver Bronco’s?

Yeah…Miami was the only team interested for a third rounder, which is what we were demanding for him.  

Also, Orton didn’t have a  no-trade clause.  If we make the deal, he goes.  Period.  He didn’t have the right to hold up anything because he wanted an extension.  If someone had been willing to give up a fifth or a sixth and rent him for the rest of the year?  Tough titties, Kyle.  Pack your bags.

“milquetoast”.  Really? 

How many QB’s have you ever seen taking snaps out of the wildcat?  Zero?  Is it zero?   

Orton outperformed Tebow in camp, and we went 1-4 with Orton. 

I’ll give you and dante some credit:  You 2 are good at moving the goalposts! 

Apples to oranges.  We don’t run the wildcat.  And that is what Dante was trying to compare our offense against.  2 totally different animals (pardon the pun).  lmao

Mr. Pakistan would rather see us lose than win, judging by his posts.

They’re better in “practice”. 

Here’s what you typed, guy:

“You can’t compare Miami’s wildcat play with our offense.  Apples and oranges when you have a QB like Tebow that can take hits”

Usually in the wildcat, you’ve got RB’s and bigger wideouts taking the snap out of the shotgun.  Those guys know how to take hits. 

It’s actually quite comparable…utilizing the standards YOU set. 

good god, man.

Reported by whom? You? Lol
Shefter said it was Mia ownership that backed out of the done deal at the 11th hour. Put your orton hate asid.e(or naivete’).
Mia had no intentions of having the same HC in ’12, so why plug any money into a qb when they could have cheaper.

Classy move? No, it was a epically moronic move.

They could have traded him this summer if they weren’t asking for such a high draft pick in exchange. Then they kept him, which pissed off a vast majority of the fan base, and he sucked.

Now he could possibly go to Chicago, where he could possibly start, and could possibly beat Denver in an extremely embarassing defeat.

I really hope you don’t know any Bears fans.

Direct your hate toward the name stated in my last post.  lmao.

You still don’t understand.  I once again wasted my time with you.  Your understanding of football is rudimentary.

Herc is a Bronco fan, he just has a different way of showing it!

At least my comments are coherent.  Unless you’re an ESL guy, your stuff is an embarrassment.  

Your ‘opinion’ is that it was a moronic move.

I was no fan of Orton, but what we wanted for Orton in August was fair.  Why should we have given him away for a low pick? 

Think about it.

“He didn’t have the right to hold up anything because he wanted an extension.”

Not applicable with that deal.  Go read the mile high report on the Orton trade deal back in August.  He refused to take less money.  He was under contract, so he did not have to take the deal.

No. It was a moronic move. 

They did this to save some money. If they really wanted to save some money they should have traded him before he collected the majority of his $8.9 million paycheck. The Broncos have already paid him over $6 million dollars.

Now the Broncos will gain nothing but four losses from Orton. If they would have kept Orton and let him go in free agency they would have at least received a compensatory pick. Now, the team that claims Orton will get that compensatory pick.

What part of that makes sense?

“If they back off that, maybe someone’s willing to rent him, maybe not.”

Right.  And the answer was, “not”.   And that’s because he sucks.

Cut him sooner, someone claims him sooner.  If someone claims him sooner, that’s less money that we have to pay him to hold a clipboard. 
 
This is a simple concept.  One even you should be able to grasp. 

Really, that one got wiped?  You’ve got guys a couple of threads down calling each other gay slurs and dropping fully spelled out f-bombs left and right and that one somehow violated the terms? 
 

Maybe he actually meant milk-toast? 

He has a point as keyboardfarts would have been technically correct.