Denver Broncos blog, news and rumors


FB

[hype it up!]
[Share with Yardbarker]

Published on 11/23/2009 at Mon Nov 23 10:25.
Tagged: ,,,,,,.



Darren Sproles #43 of the San Diego Chargers rushes against the Denver Broncos down during NFL action at Invesco Field at Mile High on November 22, 2009 in Denver, Colorado. The Chargers defeated the Broncos 32-3.  (Doug Pensinger/Getty Images)

Darren Sproles #43 of the San Diego Chargers rushes against the Denver Broncos down during NFL action at Invesco Field at Mile High on November 22, 2009 in Denver, Colorado. The Chargers defeated the Broncos 32-3. (Doug Pensinger/Getty Images)

One of the largest differences between the two Chargers games this season was the amount of pressure the Broncos were able to put on quarterback Philip Rivers.

In October, Mike Nolan‘s defense tallied five sacks against Rivers, a career high for the fourth-year starting quarterback. They were constantly in the quarterback’s face through a well-utilized variety of blitz packages.

In the loss Sunday, the Broncos didn’t register a single sack, and they hardly mounted any pressure or quarterback hits, either. The number of blitzes called, or lack thereof, had a lot to do with it.

“Well, I think in that (October) game, obviously they brought a lot of blitzes,” Philip Rivers said after the game. “It was a combination of a lot of things. In this game, and as we have the whole year, especially these last four weeks, the guys up front have been unbelievable and protective. In this game they did not blitz near as much so they kind of surprised us.”

“They didn’t bring as much as they brought in the early game.”

It’s true that the protection schemes were certainly better for San Diego, so credit them for that, but the fact that Nolan and head coach Josh McDaniels went away from what was so successful in October is disconcerting. What happened to the blitz?

Simply, with a big, early lead, the Chargers were able to run it right out of Denver.

Take a look at the difference in passing yards between the two games. Rivers actually threw for more yards and a higher average in October, with shoddy protection while the Broncos were sacking him left and right. He passed for 273 yards and an 8.3 average in Week 6 compared to only 145 yards and a 6.6 average in Week 11. In both games, he threw for one touchdown and zero interceptions.

The difference in the scoreboard more closely reflects the rushing totals between the two games. In October, the Chargers rushed for 73 yards. On Sunday, they grounded out a whopping 203.

Early mistakes cost Broncos late

The context of how the two games played out — particularly in the early goings — dictated the defense’s ability to dial up those blitz packages. In October, the Broncos were competitive early. They didn’t fall behind 13-0 by the second quarter. The teams traded game leads back and forth in the early goings, and the Broncos were able to get after Rivers with a balanced offense and defense.

On Sunday, the Chargers made the Broncos one-dimensional. They couldn’t dial up blitzes in fear of getting gashed in the running game, and they couldn’t stay disciplined in their own ground game offensively despite some big numbers by their running backs.

As a result, the Chargers were able to maintain their early lead with their best running performance of the season. Much of the 203 rushing yards tallied were in the fourth quarter, while many of the sacks and pressure the Broncos enjoyed in October occurred in that match’s fourth quarter.

The dynamic on how the games played out made all the difference.

“I think any time that you get in the red zone and turn the ball over twice the first few times you’re down there that certainly that doesn’t lend itself to winning too many games and scoring too many points,” Josh McDaniels said. “We’ve got to do better earlier in the game so that we can stay balanced, run the ball effectively and throw the ball effectively at the same time without giving away what we have to do. As the game wore on today we’re out there with a two tight end set in their nickel package because they know we have to throw it.”

Still, Nolan’s defense allowed the Chargers to march down the field several times to attain that 13-0 lead. San Diego scored on each of their first three possessions (touchdown, field goal, field goal), and the Broncos defense didn’t force a punt until late in the second quarter. Rivers was able to convert several third downs on those drives, particularly in Denver’s red zone. Had Nolan blitzed then, especially on those third downs, it could have made the difference in the early goings that might have changed the game’s tempo late.

Instead, the Broncos stayed conservative, and Rivers made them pay.

Not that getting after Rivers has ever been easy. As Jeff Legwold points out, October’s sack-fest was the exception, not the rule. Rivers is 3-1 in his four starts in Denver, having only been sacked twice in those games.

It all points to the fact that the Broncos aren’t built to come from behind. They’ve been exposed as a team that can’t stop the run in the second half, and three teams have taken the Baltimore RavensWeek 8 blueprint and run with it in that regard.

Their limitations at quarterback reared its ugly head against a Chargers defense that was able to prepare for only the pass, and this defense is at its best when it can get after the quarterback. It’s best on third and longs. As Rivers completed pass after pass on second downs, the Chargers neutralized Denver’s defensive advantage.

“We’ve got to do things well, early in the game so we can stay balanced and do the things that got us success in the beginning of the season,” McDaniels said. “Obviously in the last four weeks we haven’t done that.”

  • herc_rock

    Some weird schemes yesterday. I saw Dumervil covering wideouts or TE's on a half dozen plays at least.

  • Bolt Power

    Isn't it ironic the Chargers wear the nickname around here of 'Chokers', yet in the last few years it's the Broncos doing the choking in regular and often spectacular fashion?

  • kerry

    its obvious McD and Nolan are thinking too much when it comes to game planning. instead of just focusing on what works, they try to outscheme the other team by completely getting away from the factors that helped them win in San Diego. like the use of Tony Scheffler and dialing up the blitz. 2 HUGE factors in our win in San Diego, and NONE of that was happening yesterday.

    and its really bad when Jarvis Moss get on the field over Robert Ayers. obviously Ayers is REALLY struggling to adapt. no pass rush whatsoever.

  • IanHenson

    Just win a super bowl.

  • vince_mairne

    Good points Kerry!!!!

  • Boltindaheart

    Straight up, we own you, and we are in your heads…when your only come back is to win a Super Bowl, it is painfully obvious that you are our bitch….again!

  • ocbronco

    Rivers has owned us but with our healthy starting qb we went to your house and took it to you this year! Congrats on beating up on Chris Simms. Poor guy still isn't ready to take the field. Anyway, gloat all you want it just exposes you as the sad fans you are.

  • http://www.broncotalk.net Josh Temple

    Blah blah blah! Our AFC Championship loss is somehow better than your AFC Championship loss! Charger fan thinking kills me.

  • Depressed SF

    The Chargers, and their fans, do a lot talking for a team that has never done shit in the NFL.

  • broncosfaninal

    Yeah, I noticed that too. I think that had more to do with the formation the Chargers were running vs. a play that Nolan called. I think we had the wrong personnel on the field to cover the play, and the Chargers called the right play at the line to take Dumervil off of the pass rush.

  • dude

    we need a quarterback! PERIOD…….and for tha last few years, we have been saying the same thing “We need a pass rush”

  • Nick E

    Tell that to the current Broncos players. None of the has anything to do with the Superbowls won by John Elway's team in the last century.

  • IanHenson

    I'll take two Super Bowl wins in the last 11 years over none ever. There's not much more to say, go kick a dead horse while it's done. You whooped up on Chris Simms and Kyle Orton with a bum ankle. Hopefully we'll see you in the playoffs.

  • Gary_in_SD

    Sorry static fan, this board is not for virgins!

  • arvada62

    The TV announcers noted that the Chargers had designed a play and formation to force Dumervil into pass coverage (he is a LB remember). Obviously, the Chargers made an adjustment based on Dumervil owning Rivers in the first game. Overall, Denver got out-coached by a guy I think is a dunce, so what does that make McD for that game?

  • arvada62

    Based on the Chargers game, the Broncos need a QB, a right OT, a power RB, a cornerback to complement Champ Bailey, and at least one premier, huge DT or NT. Golly, when I read that, I realize that we have a lot of missing pieces. Meanwhile, the coaching staff is self satisfied with changing the nickel back and the punter. Maybe the Broncos shortcomings in personnel will be more obvious to them after the season.

  • arvada62

    You all do realize that the Chargers game essentially ended the season for the Broncos. Unless someone shoots Philip Rivers, the Chargers will win the division and the Broncos record (9-7) won't be good enough for a wild card slot. WAIT TIL NEXT YEAR GUYS!

  • superbowlpackages

    Yes it's right i notice that.I think we had the wrong personnel on the field to cover the play.I realize that we have a lot of missing pieces. Meanwhile, the coaching staff is self satisfied with changing the nickel back

  • superbowlpackages

    Yes it's right i notice that.I think we had the wrong personnel on the field to cover the play.I realize that we have a lot of missing pieces. Meanwhile, the coaching staff is self satisfied with changing the nickel back