Denver Broncos blog, news and rumors


FB

[hype it up!]
[Share with Yardbarker]

Published on 10/16/2007 at Tue Oct 16 13:46.
Tagged: ,.



Over Hall of Fame week (the week before the preseason began for 30 NFL teams), I discussed in detail five Broncos who belong in the Hall of Fame. They were all current eligibles, and I illustrated how disgraceful it is that a successful franchise like the Broncos has only one representative in the Hall of Fame. Year after year, we get snubbed, there’s no other way to put it.

I’ve heard over and over again that “they won’t be able to ignore Shannon Sharpe.” Well, this article (from a current member of the Hall of Fame selection committee!) is already planting the seeds to snub Sharpe upon his eligibility in 2009. The Dallas Morning News – Hall of Fame Window can Slam Shut.

When tight end Shannon Sharpe retired after the 2003 season, I assumed he’d be a slam dunk for the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

Sharpe left the game with the triple crown for tight ends – most career receptions, yards and touchdowns. Statistically, there had never been anyone better at the position.

But that’s what we thought about Art Monk, too. When he retired after the 1995 season, he was the NFL’s all-time leading receiver with 940 catches. Being the best at what you do logically would qualify you for Canton.

But by the time Monk became eligible for the Hall of Fame, Jerry Rice had motored past him on the all-time receiving list. Rice became the new standard – and Monk was passed over by the Hall of Fame selection panel in his first year of eligibility in 2001. And every year thereafter – seven years up, seven years down.

Now five players are ahead of Monk on the all-time receiving list: Rice, Cris Carter, Tim Brown, Marvin Harrison and Andre Reed. It’s tougher to sell the sixth all-time leading receiver as a profile in greatness than it is the first.

And as offensive statistics continue to explode in the pass-happy NFL, Monk will continue his slide down the receiving chart. Every year that passes makes it more difficult for him to secure a bust in Canton.

And that’s the potential pitfall facing Sharpe. By the time he’s eligible in 2009, he will not be the all-time leading receiver for his position. Here comes Tony Gonzalez.

The Kansas City tight end broke Sharpe’s record for career touchdown receptions by a tight end last weekend with two against the Cincinnati Bengals, giving him 64 in his career. Sharpe had 62.

Gonzalez also posted his 20th 100-yard receiving game against the Bengals, moving him past Sharpe into sole possession of third place on that list with 20. By 2009, Gonzalez will be the statistical standard for the position. Here are the all-time leaders at the tight-end position:

RECEPTIONS

1. Shannon Sharpe – 815

2. Tony Gonzalez – 759

3. Ozzie Newsome* – 662

4. Kellen Winslow* – 541

YARDS

1. Shannon Sharpe – 10,060

2. Tony Gonzalez – 9,048

3. Ozzie Newsome* – 7,980

4. Jackie Smith* – 7,918

TOUCHDOWNS

1. Tony Gonzalez – 64

2. Shannon Sharpe – 62

3. Jackie Smith* – 60

4. Wesley Walls – 54

100-YARD GAMES

1. Kellen Winslow* – 24

2. Jackie Smith* – 22

3. Tony Gonzalez – 20

4. Shannon Sharpe – 19

* Hall of Famer

Sharpe amassed his statistics in 14 seasons. Gonzalez has constructed his resume in 11. And off in a distance you can see the likes of Antonio Gates, Kellen Winslow Jr., Dallas Clark, Chris Cooley, Jeremy Shockey and Todd Heap getting situated for their own runs at the tight end record book.

So the first year of his eligibility will be an important one for Sharpe. That will be his best shot for induction. Every year thereafter, the memory of Sharpe and his statistics may fade. Ask Art Monk.

I can already picture the Hall of Fame voters formulating arguments against Sharpe in their minds. Maybe I’m paranoid after years of injustice toward the Broncos, but this article, plain and simple, sounds to me like the type of snowball that could turn into an avalanche against Sharpe once he’s eligible in a few short years.

  • http://broncotalk.net Kyle

    This letter got me real fired up. Just wrote a letter to the author via his e-mail:

    Mr. Gosselin,

    The Denver Broncos Organization is woefully misrepresented in the Pro Football Hall of Fame as it currently stands. As the head blogger at http://broncotalk.net, I’ve discussed several players, all currently eligible, who should already be enshrined. Of course I realize my opinion is by no means objective, but when your organization has as many wins and Super Bowl appearances as most in the league, yet has only sent one player in its history to Canton, you begin to feel like a real injustice is taking place.

    I am writing out of concern with your recent column I read, where you discussed Shannon Sharpe being potentially left out of the Hall due to Tony Gonzalez creeping up on him in the record books. I couldn’t disagree more. I think Art Monk’s absence in the Hall is a gross oversight on the part of the committee as well – one shouldn’t be judged against the players of today, but against their peers at the time they played. Isn’t that the philosophy already in place by the Hall voters when deliberately including players who were first eligible some 20-25 years ago?

    There is no doubt Sharpe belongs in the Hall of Fame. He’s a 3-time Super Bowl champion, broke all the records, and was a valuable teammate and leader in the locker room (loud mouth aside). Please don’t start planting the seeds against Sharpe being in the Hall of Fame. I challenge that as a voter yourself, you write at least as much in support of Sharpe being enshrined as you did today against him.

    Sincerely,

    Kyle Montgomery
    Blogger, broncotalk.net

  • Crosshare

    Kyle,

    I think you were preaching to the choir with your letter to Gosselin. I remember reading one of his articles awhile back on the Canton prejudice against the Broncos and the Cowboys. He made a better case than anyone in the Denver media had. He’s fighting for us in this one.

    http://www.dentonrc.com/sharedcontent/dws/spt/columnists/rgosselin/stories/101905dnspogosselin.107aa21ae.html

    I think the Art Monk theory is a slippery slope. Because the best wide receiver ever to play the game passed him in all time receiving means he can’t still be inducted? If that were the case, you should just throw out every WR that’s in Canton.

    What the voters need to realize is that Sharpe redefined the position of tight end. The reason we’re seeing the Gonzalezes, Gates, Clarks, Heaps and others now, is because offenses are building plays around the TE after seeing Sharpe do it for years. You have to think watching Sharpe kill K.C. over the middle all those times sat in their Psyche when drafting TG.

    To sum up my views, I think that Canton voters are just dumb. They don’t even vote in the maximum members each year just to remain “elite” even though there is a major logjam of deserving names. I had the special opportunity to go cheer when Elway was inducted in Canton, even got into the yellow jacket ceremony. But part of me wished that they would’ve held Elway back just to show how terribly biased they are.

  • Crosshare

    *EDIT*

    On my above posting. Please omit Gosselin and Adam Schefter from my Canton voter statement. Adam Schefter is one hell of a sports writer and I miss him dearly here in Colorado. At least I get to see him show his talent and hard work on the NFL network every week.

  • http://broncotalk.net Kyle

    Mr. Gosselin wrote me back:

    Kyle,
    Relax. He’s got my vote. If you are a regular reader of mine, you know I have pointed out the lack of Broncos in Canton time and time again. I like to examine both sides of an issue, though.
    Rick Gosselin

    Crosshare above did a great job pointing out an example of such an article. I’m not a reader of Mr. Gosselin’s (found the article through an RSS feed crawler) so admittedly didn’t know.

    As long as he’s good on his word “He’s got my vote” I’m all for it, and I absolutely agree he needs to look at all sides of an issue. OK, I’ve settled down now.

  • Jeremy

    Remind me again how many Super Bowl rings Gonzo has?