<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Look: Washington Redskins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11768/broncos-blog/first-look-washington-redskins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11768/broncos-blog/first-look-washington-redskins/</link>
	<description>Denver Broncos Blog and News Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BroncoMan24</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11768/broncos-blog/first-look-washington-redskins/comment-page-1/#comment-30840</link>
		<dc:creator>BroncoMan24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=11768#comment-30840</guid>
		<description>I say we have a pretty good chance of getting a 100+ on them.  Their offense sucks which means that their defense will probably be on the field for alot of the game, of course that means that we would have to put together a couple long drives.   Also, I think if we mix it up and put a Hillis out there that would help. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Question for you guys.  I know that at the beginning of the yr that there were talks that Mcdaniel wouldn&#039;t be using a FB that much.  Has that been the case or have they been using a FB? I have missed alot of games lately due to work and was curious.  Go Broncos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say we have a pretty good chance of getting a 100+ on them.  Their offense sucks which means that their defense will probably be on the field for alot of the game, of course that means that we would have to put together a couple long drives.   Also, I think if we mix it up and put a Hillis out there that would help. </p>
<p>Question for you guys.  I know that at the beginning of the yr that there were talks that Mcdaniel wouldn&#39;t be using a FB that much.  Has that been the case or have they been using a FB? I have missed alot of games lately due to work and was curious.  Go Broncos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary_in_SD</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11768/broncos-blog/first-look-washington-redskins/comment-page-1/#comment-30828</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary_in_SD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=11768#comment-30828</guid>
		<description>This game should be a lock, I can&#039;t see any possible way we lose this one. If I could get to Vegas this weekend, I&#039;d bet big on it with that small point spread... Yes being from SD I could go bet on it in Tj, but with the hassle of the border, not to mention the crime, I&#039;ll just hope other Bronco fans will go bet this one big for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This game should be a lock, I can&#39;t see any possible way we lose this one. If I could get to Vegas this weekend, I&#39;d bet big on it with that small point spread&#8230; Yes being from SD I could go bet on it in Tj, but with the hassle of the border, not to mention the crime, I&#39;ll just hope other Bronco fans will go bet this one big for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikebirty</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11768/broncos-blog/first-look-washington-redskins/comment-page-1/#comment-30804</link>
		<dc:creator>mikebirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=11768#comment-30804</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going for the same as last week&#039;s prediction - get 100+ yards rushing and we win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m going for the same as last week&#39;s prediction &#8211; get 100+ yards rushing and we win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BRANDON MARSHALL 15</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11768/broncos-blog/first-look-washington-redskins/comment-page-1/#comment-30803</link>
		<dc:creator>BRANDON MARSHALL 15</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=11768#comment-30803</guid>
		<description>WATCH 4 DOOOM.  HE SHOULD GET ATLEAST 2.5 SACKS ON THE SKINS.  WE TAKE THIS 24-7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WATCH 4 DOOOM.  HE SHOULD GET ATLEAST 2.5 SACKS ON THE SKINS.  WE TAKE THIS 24-7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BRANDON MARSHALL 15</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11768/broncos-blog/first-look-washington-redskins/comment-page-1/#comment-30802</link>
		<dc:creator>BRANDON MARSHALL 15</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=11768#comment-30802</guid>
		<description>WATCH 4 DOOOM.  HE SHOULD GET ATLEAST 2.5 SACKS ON THE SKINS.  WE TAKE THIS 24-7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WATCH 4 DOOOM.  HE SHOULD GET ATLEAST 2.5 SACKS ON THE SKINS.  WE TAKE THIS 24-7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

