<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ty Law expected to play Monday vs. Steelers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11547/broncos-buzz/ty-law-expected-to-play-monday-vs-steelers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11547/broncos-buzz/ty-law-expected-to-play-monday-vs-steelers/</link>
	<description>Denver Broncos Blog and News Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steeplebomb</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11547/broncos-buzz/ty-law-expected-to-play-monday-vs-steelers/comment-page-1/#comment-30559</link>
		<dc:creator>steeplebomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=11547#comment-30559</guid>
		<description>It was in his NFL picks for this week i think</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was in his NFL picks for this week i think</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SivNiz</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11547/broncos-buzz/ty-law-expected-to-play-monday-vs-steelers/comment-page-1/#comment-30543</link>
		<dc:creator>SivNiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=11547#comment-30543</guid>
		<description>Which podcast?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which podcast?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheTroglodyte</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11547/broncos-buzz/ty-law-expected-to-play-monday-vs-steelers/comment-page-1/#comment-30534</link>
		<dc:creator>TheTroglodyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=11547#comment-30534</guid>
		<description>Law is very solid on the run and tackling for a cb. He was a key cog in the Patriots dominating D that won a couple of super bowls (Bill wouldn&#039;t have kept around a finesse cb that couldn&#039;t tackle). McDaniels was also the defensive backs coach before he became the offensive coordinator so he is very familiar with what Law can bring to the table at the nickel position.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Law should also be worked into the dime and will be a huge bonus in zone coverages where his ability to read an offenses play before it fully develops will pay off huge since intelligence is more important than speed and agility in playing the underneath zone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Law is very solid on the run and tackling for a cb. He was a key cog in the Patriots dominating D that won a couple of super bowls (Bill wouldn&#39;t have kept around a finesse cb that couldn&#39;t tackle). McDaniels was also the defensive backs coach before he became the offensive coordinator so he is very familiar with what Law can bring to the table at the nickel position.</p>
<p>Law should also be worked into the dime and will be a huge bonus in zone coverages where his ability to read an offenses play before it fully develops will pay off huge since intelligence is more important than speed and agility in playing the underneath zone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiamiMike</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11547/broncos-buzz/ty-law-expected-to-play-monday-vs-steelers/comment-page-1/#comment-30533</link>
		<dc:creator>MiamiMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=11547#comment-30533</guid>
		<description>Here is a definition of the nickel-back position from a site. This will help explain in some detail for those that are not 100% sure. It is not meant to be sarcastic by any means. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With this it shows that Law will not be covering the #1 W.R. Law (should be able to still handle the #3-4 wideouts just with his experience. It&#039;s been a while so I am not sure how he tackles and plays the run. This position will help with the run as well. If you do know please help me out. THANKS&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;a nickelback is a cornerback who serves as the fifth (in addition to the typical four) defensive back on the defense. A base defense contains four defensive backs, consisting of two cornerbacks, and two safeties. Adding an extra back makes five, hence the term &quot;nickel&quot;, which is the name for 5-cent coins in the United States and Canada. Usually the nickelback will take the place of a linebacker, so if the team was in a 4-3 formation, there would now be four linemen, only two linebackers and five defensive backs creating a 4-2-5 formation. However, some teams will replace a lineman rather than a linebacker, creating a three linemen, three linebacker and five defensive back alignment, a 3-3-5 formation. If an offensive team always uses three or more wide receivers, a defense may turn to a nickel defense for their base package on most plays. Usually extra defensive backs, such as a nickelback, are substituted into the defense in situations where the opposing offense is likely to attempt a forward pass, such as 3rd-and-long, or when extra receivers are substituted into the opposing offense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The nickelback is the third cornerback on the depth chart. The nickelback is not considered a starting position because the starting formation for a defense has only two cornerbacks. Defensive formations with four or more cornerbacks are used often enough that a nickelback will usually see moderate playing time (particularly in the modern, pass-oriented NFL) as well as subbing in for the starting corners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a definition of the nickel-back position from a site. This will help explain in some detail for those that are not 100% sure. It is not meant to be sarcastic by any means. </p>
<p>With this it shows that Law will not be covering the #1 W.R. Law (should be able to still handle the #3-4 wideouts just with his experience. It&#39;s been a while so I am not sure how he tackles and plays the run. This position will help with the run as well. If you do know please help me out. THANKS</p>
<p>a nickelback is a cornerback who serves as the fifth (in addition to the typical four) defensive back on the defense. A base defense contains four defensive backs, consisting of two cornerbacks, and two safeties. Adding an extra back makes five, hence the term &#8220;nickel&#8221;, which is the name for 5-cent coins in the United States and Canada. Usually the nickelback will take the place of a linebacker, so if the team was in a 4-3 formation, there would now be four linemen, only two linebackers and five defensive backs creating a 4-2-5 formation. However, some teams will replace a lineman rather than a linebacker, creating a three linemen, three linebacker and five defensive back alignment, a 3-3-5 formation. If an offensive team always uses three or more wide receivers, a defense may turn to a nickel defense for their base package on most plays. Usually extra defensive backs, such as a nickelback, are substituted into the defense in situations where the opposing offense is likely to attempt a forward pass, such as 3rd-and-long, or when extra receivers are substituted into the opposing offense.</p>
<p>The nickelback is the third cornerback on the depth chart. The nickelback is not considered a starting position because the starting formation for a defense has only two cornerbacks. Defensive formations with four or more cornerbacks are used often enough that a nickelback will usually see moderate playing time (particularly in the modern, pass-oriented NFL) as well as subbing in for the starting corners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steeplebomb</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11547/broncos-buzz/ty-law-expected-to-play-monday-vs-steelers/comment-page-1/#comment-30532</link>
		<dc:creator>steeplebomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=11547#comment-30532</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll see...  McD really wants to win now, thats for sure.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not related but Bill Simmons said this about the coming matchup:&lt;br&gt;I am not buying the whole &quot;Baltimore proved how to stop Denver&#039;s offense&quot; thing. At all. Guarantee Josh McDaniels studied what the Ravens did for 75 hours this week and made all the necessary adjustments. Beware of the altitude; beware of Elvis and Knowshon; and most of all, beware of the Neck Beard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#39;ll see&#8230;  McD really wants to win now, thats for sure.  </p>
<p>Not related but Bill Simmons said this about the coming matchup:<br />I am not buying the whole &#8220;Baltimore proved how to stop Denver&#39;s offense&#8221; thing. At all. Guarantee Josh McDaniels studied what the Ravens did for 75 hours this week and made all the necessary adjustments. Beware of the altitude; beware of Elvis and Knowshon; and most of all, beware of the Neck Beard.</p>
<p>Nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: broncoinva9986</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11547/broncos-buzz/ty-law-expected-to-play-monday-vs-steelers/comment-page-1/#comment-30531</link>
		<dc:creator>broncoinva9986</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=11547#comment-30531</guid>
		<description>I know Jack so I don&#039;t know a little indifferent....but winning is the name of the game</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Jack so I don&#39;t know a little indifferent&#8230;.but winning is the name of the game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheTroglodyte</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11547/broncos-buzz/ty-law-expected-to-play-monday-vs-steelers/comment-page-1/#comment-30530</link>
		<dc:creator>TheTroglodyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=11547#comment-30530</guid>
		<description>Jack Williams couldn&#039;t even keep his spot ahead of Josh Bell (who was cut by San Diego) last year. This year he filled in decently in limited fashion on plays involving small wr&#039;s but he is no longer needed with the signing of Law. Even if Smith is hurt, we could plug in Barrett or Woodyard and get just as good of coverage as Williams offered if not better because both Barrett and Woodyard can over some bump at the line on bigger slot wr&#039;s. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Law is a more physical and crafty player that fits in better with McD&#039;s philosophy of smash mouth football. Williams was owned by Kelley Washington because Washington is 6-3 217. Not because Washington has any special skills. That is why he was cut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack Williams couldn&#39;t even keep his spot ahead of Josh Bell (who was cut by San Diego) last year. This year he filled in decently in limited fashion on plays involving small wr&#39;s but he is no longer needed with the signing of Law. Even if Smith is hurt, we could plug in Barrett or Woodyard and get just as good of coverage as Williams offered if not better because both Barrett and Woodyard can over some bump at the line on bigger slot wr&#39;s. </p>
<p>Law is a more physical and crafty player that fits in better with McD&#39;s philosophy of smash mouth football. Williams was owned by Kelley Washington because Washington is 6-3 217. Not because Washington has any special skills. That is why he was cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: texaspat71</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11547/broncos-buzz/ty-law-expected-to-play-monday-vs-steelers/comment-page-1/#comment-30529</link>
		<dc:creator>texaspat71</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=11547#comment-30529</guid>
		<description>Go Denver Patriots!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Denver Patriots!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: texaspat71</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11547/broncos-buzz/ty-law-expected-to-play-monday-vs-steelers/comment-page-1/#comment-30528</link>
		<dc:creator>texaspat71</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=11547#comment-30528</guid>
		<description>Go Denver Patriots</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Denver Patriots</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Money</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2009/11/11547/broncos-buzz/ty-law-expected-to-play-monday-vs-steelers/comment-page-1/#comment-30527</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=11547#comment-30527</guid>
		<description>Phonosy came out of the gates playing like a first round draft pick but when he got hurt Jack stepped up and took his place. Then got utterly owned all day long by Baltimore and since, as kyle said, the two of them are the &quot;go to&quot; targets on third down and also in long yardage situations.... it&#039;s important to get off the field and neither of the two were getting it done. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll leave it at this.  If Ty Law is in shape and can still play at an elite level then I don&#039;t mind the signing.  BUT if he brakes down then I&#039;ll be upset that we got rid of potential for experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phonosy came out of the gates playing like a first round draft pick but when he got hurt Jack stepped up and took his place. Then got utterly owned all day long by Baltimore and since, as kyle said, the two of them are the &#8220;go to&#8221; targets on third down and also in long yardage situations&#8230;. it&#39;s important to get off the field and neither of the two were getting it done. </p>
<p>I&#39;ll leave it at this.  If Ty Law is in shape and can still play at an elite level then I don&#39;t mind the signing.  BUT if he brakes down then I&#39;ll be upset that we got rid of potential for experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

