<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broncos Bring Back the Mustard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broncotalk.net/2008/10/3388/broncos-news/broncos-bring-back-the-mustard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broncotalk.net/2008/10/3388/broncos-news/broncos-bring-back-the-mustard/</link>
	<description>Denver Broncos Blog and News Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jchase8410</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2008/10/3388/broncos-news/broncos-bring-back-the-mustard/comment-page-1/#comment-10613</link>
		<dc:creator>jchase8410</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=3388#comment-10613</guid>
		<description>That really has to mess with his head. Poor gandy has been waived like 4 times this season. As a player I would be very frustrated by this move, but since neither of them really see too much of the field...

Why sign a guy when they have 4 other guys at the position? Why not focus on a position where they lack depth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That really has to mess with his head. Poor gandy has been waived like 4 times this season. As a player I would be very frustrated by this move, but since neither of them really see too much of the field&#8230;</p>
<p>Why sign a guy when they have 4 other guys at the position? Why not focus on a position where they lack depth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Douglas</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2008/10/3388/broncos-news/broncos-bring-back-the-mustard/comment-page-1/#comment-10610</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=3388#comment-10610</guid>
		<description>I see Nate Jackson stepping up big time this next week.  IMHO

I like the move - as Mustard adds depth, but Nate Jackson&#039;s a converted WR and (while he lacks Scheffler&#039;s speed) he can make critical catches - and that fills our need in light of Scheffler&#039;s injury.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Nate Jackson stepping up big time this next week.  IMHO</p>
<p>I like the move &#8211; as Mustard adds depth, but Nate Jackson&#8217;s a converted WR and (while he lacks Scheffler&#8217;s speed) he can make critical catches &#8211; and that fills our need in light of Scheffler&#8217;s injury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreasyQtip</title>
		<link>http://broncotalk.net/2008/10/3388/broncos-news/broncos-bring-back-the-mustard/comment-page-1/#comment-10606</link>
		<dc:creator>GreasyQtip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broncotalk.net/?p=3388#comment-10606</guid>
		<description>OH my girlfriend loves this move! Hes always been her favorite name in the NFL, she was so sad when we dropped him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH my girlfriend loves this move! Hes always been her favorite name in the NFL, she was so sad when we dropped him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

